Skip to main content

Blogging about Let's encrypt over HTTP

So let's encrypt thing started. And it can do challenges over http (serving text files) and over dns (serving .txt records).

My "infrastructure" is fairly modest. I've seen too many of my email accounts getting swamped with spam, and or companies going bust. So I got my own domain name surgut.co.uk. However, I don't have money or time to run my own services. So I've signed up for the Google Apps account for my domain to do email, blogging, etc.

Then later i got the libnih.la domain to host API docs for the mentioned library. In the world of .io startups, I thought it's an incredibly funny domain name.

But I also have a VPS to host static files on ad-hoc basis, run VPN, and an irc bouncer. My irc bouncer is ZNC and I used a self-signed certificate there, thus i had "ignore" ssl errors in all of my irc clients... which kind of defeats the purposes somewhat.

I run my VPS on i386 (to save on memory usage) and on Ubuntu 14.04 LTS managed with Landscape. And my little services are just configured by hand there (not using juju).

My first attempt at getting on the let's encrypt bandwagon was to use the official client. By fetching debs from xenial, and installing that on LTS. But the package/script there is huge, has support for things I don't need, and wants dependencies I don't have on 14.04 LTS.

However I found a minimalist implementation letsencrypt.sh implemented in shell, with openssl and curl. It was trivial to get dependencies for and configure. Specified a domains text file, and that was it. And well, added sym links in my NGINX config to serve the challenges directory & a hook to deploy certificate to znc and restart that. I've added a cronjob to renew the certs too. Thinking about it, it's not complete as I'm not sure if NGINX will pick up certificate change and/or if it will need to be reloaded. I shall test that, once my cert expires.

Tweaking config for NGINX was easy. And I was like, let's see how good it is. I pointed https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/ at my https://x4d.surgut.co.uk/ and I got a "C" rating. No forward secrecy, vulnerable to down grade attacks, BEAST, POODLE and stuff like that. I went googling for all types of NGINX configs and eventually found website with "best known practices" https://cipherli.st/ However, even that only got me to "B" rating, as it still has Diffie-Hellman things that ssltest caps at "B" rating. So I disabled those too. I've ended up with this gibberish:

ssl_protocols TLSv1 TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2;
ssl_prefer_server_ciphers on;
ssl_ciphers "EECDH+AESGCM:AES256+EECDH";
ssl_ecdh_curve secp384r1; # Requires nginx >= 1.1.0
ssl_session_cache shared:SSL:10m;
#ssl_session_tickets off; # Requires nginx >= 1.5.9
ssl_stapling on; # Requires nginx >= 1.3.7
ssl_stapling_verify on; # Requires nginx => 1.3.7
#resolver $DNS-IP-1 $DNS-IP-2 valid=300s;
#resolver_timeout 5s;
add_header Strict-Transport-Security "max-age=63072000; includeSubdomains; preload";
add_header X-Frame-Options DENY;
add_header X-Content-Type-Options nosniff;

I call it gibberish, because IMHO, I shouldn't need to specify any of the above... Anyway I got my A+ rating.

However, security is as best as the weakest link. I'm still serving things over HTTP, maybe I should disable that. And I'm yet to check how "good" the TLS is on my znc. Or if I need to further harden my sshd configuration.

This has filled a big gap in my infrastructure. However a few things remain served over HTTP only.

http://blog.surgut.co.uk is hosted by an Alphabet's / Google's Blogger service. Which I would want to be served over HTTPS.

http://libnih.la is hosted by GitHub Inc service. Which I would want to be served over HTTPS.

I do not want to manage those services, experience load / spammers / DDoS attacks etc. But I am happy to sign CSRs with let's encrypt and deploy certs over to those companies. Or allow them to self-obtain certificates from let's encrypt on my behalf. I used gandi.net as my domain names provider, which offers an RPC API to manage domains and their zones files, thus e.g. I can also generate an API token for those companies to respond with a dns-01 challenge from let's encrypt.

One step at a time I guess.

The postings on this site are my own and don't necessarily represent any past/present/future employers' positions, strategies, or opinions.

Comments

  1. Great post, thanks for sharing!

    Hương Lâm với website Huonglam.vn chuyên cung cấp máy photocopy toshiba cũ và dòng máy máy photocopy ricoh cũ uy tín, giá rẻ nhất TP.HCM

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Achieving actually full disk encryption of UEFI ESP at rest with TCG OPAL, FIPS, LUKS

Achieving full disk encryption using FIPS, TCG OPAL and LUKS to encrypt UEFI ESP on bare-metal and in VMs Many security standards such as CIS and STIG require to protect information at rest. For example, NIST SP 800-53r5 SC-28 advocate to use cryptographic protection, offline storage and TPMs to enhance protection of information confidentiality and/or integrity. Traditionally to satisfy such controls on portable devices such as laptops one would utilize software based Full Disk Encryption - Mac OS X FileVault , Windows Bitlocker , Linux cryptsetup LUKS2 . In cases when FIPS cryptography is required, additional burden would be placed onto these systems to operate their kernels in FIPS mode. Trusted Computing Group  works on establishing many industry standards and specifications, which are widely adopted to improve safety and security of computing whilst keeping it easy to use. One of their most famous specifications them is TCG  TPM 2.0 (Trusted Platform Module). TPMs are now...

Security-only OpenSSL tarball releases for CVE-2026-2673

On Friday May the 13th OpenSSL project has published advisory details for  CVE-2026-2673 . The CVE is treated as non-important by the project. The patches are only provided as commits on the stable branches. No git tag, no precise fixed version, and no source tarballs provided. The patches that were merged to openssl-3.5 and openssl-3.6 branches were not based on top of the last stable point release and did not split code changes & documentation updates. It means that cherry-picking the commits referenced in the advisory will always lead to conflicts requiring manual resolution. It is not clear if support is provided for snapshot builds off the openssl-3.5 and openssl-3.6 branches. As the builds from the stable branches declare themselves as dev builds of the next unreleased point release. For example, in contrast to projects such as vim and glibc, with every commit to stable branches explicitly recommended for distributors to ship and is supported. I have requested OpenSSL ups...

Encrypt all the things

xkcd #538: Security Went into blogger settings and enabled TLS on my custom domain blogger blog. So it is now finally a https://blog.surgut.co.uk  However, I do use feedburner and syndicate that to the planet. I am not sure if that is end-to-end TLS connections, thus I will look into removing feedburner between my blog and the ubuntu/debian planets. My experience with changing feeds in the planets is that I end up spamming everyone. I wonder, if I should make a new tag and add that one, and add both feeds to the planet config to avoid spamming old posts. Next up went into gandi LiveDNS platform and enabled DNSSEC on my domain. It propagated quite quickly, but I believe my domain is now correctly signed with DNSSEC stuff. Next up I guess, is to fix DNSSEC with captive portals. I guess what we really want to have on "wifi" like devices, is to first connect to wifi and not set it as default route. Perform captive portal check, potentially with a reduced DNS server capabil...